« And this is the guy Obama backs | Main | Legitimizing The Abuse of Power »
July 22, 2009
Real Reform
Bobby Jindal lays out what real health care reform ought to be, and what it isn't.
'The left in Washington has concluded that honesty will not yield its desired policy result. So it resorts to a fundamentally dishonest approach to reform. I say this because the marketing of the Democrats’ plans as presented in the House of Representatives and endorsed heartily by President Obama rests on three falsehoods.
First, Mr. Obama doggedly promises that if you like your (private) health-care coverage now, you can keep it. That promise is hollow, because the Democrats’ reforms are designed to push an ever-increasing number of Americans into a government-run health-care plan.
If a so-called public option is part of health-care reform, the Lewin Group study estimates over 100 million Americans may leave private plans for government-run health care. Any government plan will benefit from taxpayer subsidies and be able to operate at a financial loss—competing unfairly in the marketplace until private plans are driven out of business. The government plan will become so large that it will set, rather than negotiate, prices. This will inevitably lead to monopoly, with a resulting threat to the quality of our health care.
Second, the Democrats disingenuously argue their reforms will not diminish the quality of our health care even as government involvement in the delivery of that health care increases massively. For all of us who have seen the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s response to hurricanes, this contention is laughable on its face. When government bureaucracies drive the delivery of services—in this case inserting themselves between health-care providers and their patients—quality degradation will surely come. House Democrats seem willing to accept that problem to achieve their philosophical aim—the long-term removal of for-profit entities from the health-care landscape.
Third, Mr. Obama’s rhetoric paints a picture of a massive new benefit that will actually cost average Americans less than what they pay today. The Democrats want middle-class taxpayers to believe they won’t feel the pinch of this initiative, even as their employers are assessed massive new taxes. They might as well try to argue that up is down. The analysis of the Democrats’ proposal by the Congressional Budget Office shows that it will not reduce government spending on health care, and that it will substantially increase the federal deficit—and this despite all the tax increases.'
As long as there has been a "left" there has been a profound dishonesty in the promotion of leftist policy. That's because leftist policy is designed first and foremost to promote leftist control. Everything else is just an excuse for giving it to them.
Posted by Tom Bowler at 05:41 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ece669e201157222b05f970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Real Reform:
Comments
Howdy, Leaner
The "progressives" seem devotedly against two things: profit and individual responsibility. Since profit and individual responsibility are keys to achievement, progressives are, in the end, obstacles to achievement. That may not be their goal but it is their result.
This shows up in healthcare in part, I think, because healthcare is an economic activity but it's different from most economic activities. If your budget is tight, you can substitute one food choice for another (and get officially labeled "food insecure" or "hungry"). You can keep wearing some clothing after you would prefer to replace it. You can keep a car going waay longer than Detroit and Tokyo want you to.
If you're gasping for breath and have chest pain, you're going to try to get care. If you're vomiting violently and extensively, you're going to try to get care. If you're sprawled on the sidewalk, bleeding from a scalp injury, people are going to call help for you. Healthcare is an economic good that is imperative in many cases. It is also an expensive good; it takes trained people and costly equipment to examine, diagnose and treat health problems with any degree of sophistication. Healthcare was a lot less expensive when people needed less of it and when there was less it could do. It is, frankly, cheaper to die of cancer than to survive it.
In the name of making sure people can pay for imperative healthcare, progressives intend to take over the financing and, I feel sure, the delivery of healthcare. If they do, we will all be expected to comply with the nanny-fascists' ideals of healthy living, wellness and preventive care. The joke on screening and preventive care is that they seem to do little to change outcomes and they raise costs considerably.
Posted by: Geoff Brown | Jul 22, 2009 9:24:17 AM



