Today's Washington Post and New York Times both carry articles on the troubles facing the GOP. Under the Post headline Troubled Year Gets Worse for the GOP Dan Balz claims,
On almost every front, Republicans see trouble. Bush is at the low point of his presidency, with Iraq, hurricane relief, rising gasoline prices and another Supreme Court vacancy all problems to be solved. Congressional Republicans have seen their approval ratings slide throughout the spring and summer; a Washington Post-ABC News poll in August found that just 37 percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is doing its job, the lowest rating in eight years.
And at the grey lady, For G.O.P., DeLay Indictment Adds to a Sea of Troubles.
In the House, Mr. DeLay's indictment removes, even if temporarily, a powerful leader who managed to eke out, again and again, narrow majorities on some difficult votes. In the Senate, Republican ranks have been roiled this week by an investigation of Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader, who is under scrutiny for his stock dealings from a blind trust.
The trigger for this latest spate of wishful thinking on the part of our fourth estate is the indictment of House Majority Leader Tom Delay for alleged violations of campaign finance laws. But the Post lead editorial has this to say.
Nonetheless, at least on the evidence presented so far, the indictment of Mr. DeLay by a state prosecutor in Texas gives us pause. The charge concerns the activities of Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC), a political action committee created by Mr. DeLay and his aides to orchestrate the GOP's takeover of the Texas legislature in 2002. The issue is whether Mr. DeLay and his political aides illegally used the group to evade the state's ban on corporate contributions to candidates. The indictment alleges that TRMPAC took $155,000 in corporate contributions and then sent a check for $190,000 to the national Republican Party's "soft money" arm. The national committee then wrote $190,000 in checks from its noncorporate accounts to seven Texas candidates. Perhaps most damning, TRMPAC dictated the precise amount and recipients of those donations.
This was an obvious end run around the corporate contribution rule. The more difficult question is whether it was an illegal end run -- or, to be more precise, one so blatantly illegal that it amounts to a criminal felony rather than a civil violation. For Mr. DeLay to be convicted, prosecutors will have to show not only that he took part in the dodge but also that he knew it amounted to a violation of state law -- rather than the kind of clever money-trade that election lawyers engineer all the time.
Delay's crime is that he's been an effective leader.
In the meantime, as required by party rules, Mr. DeLay has stepped aside as majority leader. Whatever happens in the criminal case, perhaps this latest controversy will cause his colleagues to rethink whether he is, in fact, the person they really want as their leader.
Perhaps if the Republicans were to seek someone less effective.
The problem for the press and the Democrats is, that 2006 is too far away. Poll numbers for Bush are not extraordinarily low for second term presidents at this stage of their administrations. The controversies surrounding Delay, Frist, and Katrina are non-stories to begin with, and will no doubt disappear altogether by the time the campaign season begins. The Democratic leadership is far too pathetic to gain on the strength of these minor annoyances. I'm fully confident they'll shoot themselves in the proverbial foot over the next Supreme Court confirmation.
Rick Moran has a good take on it over at RightWing NutHouse.
Comments