Today Sissy Willis tweeted a link to her very first blog post.
In her first blog post Sissy said, "We wish you a Merry Christmas!"
I met Sissy and a group of New England bloggers a few years after that, in March of 2006 actually. Sissy described us as "Bloggers sub rosa":
Speaking of teaching methods, there's still no better pedagogy than the School of Hard Knocks. We have a cabal of graduates of that venerable institution blogging undercover right here in mostly blue-state New England, and not a groupthinker among them.
[...]
Many came of age as truth-seeking liberals until 9/11 came knocking. A group of them met recently in a seminar room at Boston University to share fear-society horror tales. Miss Kelly sums it up nicely:
Kind of nice to sit around a table with smart, opinionated people and hear how others got started, what motivates them, how they find time to blog. I was a little surprised that we're all "of a certain age." I was expecting at least a few young punks.
Like the heart that loves, the punk that blogs is ever young. The list:
Augean Stables
Libertarian Leanings
Miss Kelly
neo-neocon
Squaring the Boston Globe
SolomoniaAnd ourselves, of course. Lots of blogfood for thought. Now off to update our blogroll.
Visiting Sissy's first post set off an attack of nostalgia, so I went back to look at my own first blog post. April 25, 2004.
Dems heed the words of Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi once said, “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing.” This could be the motto of the Democrats today, as they fight to regain their former position of dominance in American politics. Their fight apparently has no rules. Nothing is out of bounds.
Al Gore lost the 2000 election, but it was not until after he retracted his concession and sent the lawyers into Florida, in an attempt to overturn the election results on unfounded charges of racism, intimidation, and voter confusion. This has been a favorite strategy of elitist Democrats. They seem to think they should not be constrained by election results or conventionally enacted law. When democracy’s results displease, it’s off to the courts, in search of a venue where law can be enacted on the fly from the bench.
Feels like I could have written that yesterday, except that this time, with a fortunate miscalculation, Democrats came in with a plan to fix election laws ahead of time instead of trying to overturn them after the fact. Covid gave them pretext for extending deadlines and allowing mail-in voting, but they got those changes through court challenges and administrative edicts. Their problem is that according to the U.S. Constitution, setting the rules for voting falls to the state legislatures. Legal challenges have been filed.
And then Democrats misjudged the extent of Trump's popularity, and in he wee hours of the morning they realized that they were short on the phony ballots that mail-in voting was supposed to provide,. That's when counting stopped, simultaneously, in key battleground states and Democrat poll workers frantically worked to fix their problem. Legal challenges and affidavits have been filed.
And here we sit, waiting for the challenges to make their way through the courts. We must wait until then before conceding that Democrats have successfully stolen this presidency.